PUBLICATIONS

The following are selected STEM education publications of our members since 2005.  Many of our members publish extensively in the traditional STEM subjects; these publications are not included here.

Books

Refereed journal papers

Refereed papers in conference proceedings

Refereed book chapters and reports

Books

  1. Klymchuk, S. & Gulyaev, S. (2017). Selected Puzzles, Paradoxes and Sophisms for Tertiary STEM Students (E-book). Wellington, New Zealand: Ako Aotearoa. 
    https://akoaotearoa.ac.nz/enhancing-generic-thinking-skills-of-tertiary-stem-students-through-puzzle-based-learning?mc_cid=c098b984bd&mc_eid=eb3b2f243a
  2. Kachapova, F. (2013). Mathematical models in portfolio analysis (1 ed.). Bookboon.com (Ventus Publishing ApS). Retrieved from http://bookboon.com/en/textbooks/mathematics/mathematical-models-in-portfolio-analysis
  3. Klymchuk, S., & Staples, S. (2013). Paradoxes and Sophisms in Calculus. USA: Mathematical Association of America. Retrieved from
    http://www.maa.org/publications/books/paradoxes-and-sophisms-in-calculus
  4. Ivanov, O., & Klymchuk, S. (2013). Mathematical Analysis for First-Year Students (in Russian). Moscow, Russia: Moscow Centre for Continuing Education in Mathematics. Retrieved from http://biblio.mccme.ru/node/2886
  5. Klymchuk, S. (2013). Money Puzzles (in Chinese). Hong Kong, China: Mathematics Learning Society.
  6. Roopak, S., Partha, S. R., & Samik, B. (2013). Correct-by-Construction Approaches for SoC Design. Springer. Retrieved from http://www.springer.com/engineering/circuits+%26+systems/book/978-1-4614-7863-8
  7. Klymchuk, S. (2012). Financial Conundrums in Mathematics Classes (in Ukrainian). Kiev, Ukraine: School World.
  8. Huang, L. (2011).  Introduction to Rigid Body Mechanics for Multidiscipinary Engineering. New York:Springer
  9. Klymchuk, S. (2011). Paradoxes and Sophisms in Calculus - Second Edition. Auckland, New Zealand: Maths Press.
  10. Klymchuk, S. (2010). Counterexamples in Calculus. Washington, USA: Mathematical Association of America (MAA). Retrieved from http://www.maa.org/publications/books/counterexamples-in-calculus
  11. Mason, J., & Klymchuk, S. (2009). Using Counter-Examples in Calculus. London, UK: Imperial College Press. Retrieved from https://www.worldscibooks.com/mathematics/p627.html
  12. Klymchuk, S. (2008). Riddles with Money: Mathematical Reasoning Development and Lateral Thinking (in Spanish). Mexico: Editorial Trillas, Mexico. Retrieved from http://www.gandhi.com.mx/index.cfm/id/Producto/dept/libros/pid/332231
  13. Klymchuk, S. (2007). Money Puzzles: Fun with Finance. India: Rupa. Retrieved from http://www.abebooks.co.uk/Money-Puzzles-Fun-Finance-Klymchuk-Sergiy/9797973132/bd
  14. Gruenwald, N., Buckeridge, J., Gulyaev, S., & Klymchuk, S. (2007). Shape Puzzles: On Spatial Thinking and Creative Design (in German and English). Germany: Wismar University.
  15. Klymchuk, S. (2006). Number Puzzles (in Korean and English). Singapore: Times Editions – Marshall Cavendish.
  16. Buckeridge, J., Gulyaev, S., & Klymchuk, S. (2006). Science Puzzles (in Korean and English). Singapore: Times Editions – Marshall Cavendish. Retrieved from http://www.amazon.ca/Science-puzzles-Korean-JOHN-BUCKERIDGE/dp/8987799565
  17. Gruenwald, N., Buckeridge, J., Gulyaev, S., & Klymchuk, S. (2006). Science Puzzles: On Creative Thinking and Discovery Learning (in German and English). Germany: Wismar University.
  18. Sarkar, N. I. (Ed.). (2006). Tools for Teaching Computer Networking and Hardware Concepts. Hershey PA: Information Science Publishing, p386. ISBN: 1-59140-735-4; eISBN: 1-59140-736-2.
  19. Klymchuk, S. (2005). Money Puzzles. San Francisco, USA: University Games. Retrieved from http://www.wheelersbooks.com.au/books/9781575289779-money-puzzles-sink-back-and-solve-away/
  20. Gruenwald, N., & Klymchuk, S. (2005). Money Puzzles: On Critical Thinking and Financial Literacy (in German and English). Wismar, Germany: Wismar University.
  21. Klymchuk, S. (2005). Paradoxes and Sophisms in Calculus. Auckland, New Zealand: Maths Press. Retrieved from http://www.wheelersbooks.com.au/books/9780473105501-paradoxes-and-sophisms-in-calculus/
  22. Buckeridge, J., Gulyaev, S., & Klymchuk, S. (2005). Shape Puzzles. Singapore: Times Editions - Marshall Cavendish. Retrieved from http://www.amazon.com/Shape-Puzzles-John-Buckeridge/dp/9812611916
  23. Klymchuk, S. (2004). Counter-Examples in Calculus. Auckland, New Zealand: Maths Press. Retrieved from http://www.worldcat.org/title/counter-examples-in-calculus/oclc/70050457?referer=di&ht=edition
  24. Klymchuk, S. (2004). Number Puzzles. Singapore: Times Editions.
  25. Buckeridge, J., Gulyaev, S., & Klymchuk, S. (2004). Science Puzzles. Singapore: Times Editions.

Back to top

Refereed journal papers

2021

  1. Sarkar, N. I., Mussa, O., Gul, S. (2021). Impact of People’s Movement on Wi-Fi Link Throughput in Indoor Propagation Environments: An Empirical Study. Electronics, 10(6), 856, pp. 1-26. doi:10.3390/electronics10070856

2020

  1. Evans, T., Klymchuk, S., Murphy, P., Novak, J., Stephens, J., Thomas, M. (2020). Engagement of undergraduate STEM students: the influence of non-routine problems. Higher Education Research & Development. Published online 30 Oct 2020, doi:10.1080/07294360.2020.1835838
  2. Evans, T., Thomas, M., Klymchuk, S. (2020). Non-routine problem solving through the lens of self-efficacy. Higher Education Research & Development. Published online 29 Sep 2020, doi:10.1080/07294360.2020.1818061
  3. Klymchuk, S. & Spooner, K. (2020). University students’ preferences for application problems and pure mathematics questions. Teaching Mathematics and its Applications: An International Journal of the IMA, 39(1), 29-37. doi:10.1093/teamat/hry014
  4. Murphy, P., Evans, T., Klymchuk, S., Novak, J., Stephens, J., Thomas, M. (2020). University STEM students’ perceptions of creativity in non-routine problem-solving. Australian and New Zealand Industrial and Applied Mathematics Journal (ANZIAM Journal), 61 (EMAC2019), C152-C165. doi:10.21914/anziamj.v61i0.15052
  5. Clear, T. (2020). Software ecosystems: What do we need to know?. ACM Inroads, 11(2), 18-20. doi:10.1145/3395963
  6. Alwaghid, Al. and Sarkar, N. I. (2020). Exploring Malware Behavior of Webpages Using Machine Learning Technique: An Empirical Study. Electronics, 9(6), pp.1-20 1033; doi:10.3390/electronics9061033

2019

  1. Clear, T., & Beecham, S. (2019). Editorial. Global software engineering education practice continuum special issue of the ACM transactions on computing education,19(2). doi:10.1145/3294011

2018

  1. Klymchuk, S. & Spooner, K. (2018). University students’ preferences for application problems and pure mathematics questions. Teaching Mathematics and its Applications: An International Journalof the IMA, published online 4 July 2018. https://academic.oup.com/teamat/advance-article/doi/10.1093/teamat/hry014/5047441?guestAccessKey=27ecd069-03ce-484c-bb47-dea497d12bde
  2. Maclaren, P., Wilson, D., & Klymchuk, S. (2018). Making the point: the place of gesture and annotation in teaching STEM subjects using pen-enabled Tablet PCs. Teaching Mathematics and its Applications: An International Journal of the IMA, 37(1), 17-36. doi:10.1093/teamat/hrx002
  3. Wu, J., Guo, S., Huang, H., Liu, W., & Xiang, Y. (2018). Information and Communications Technologies for Sustainable Development Goals: State-of-the-Art, Needs and Perspectives. IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials. DOI: 10.1109/COMST.2018.2812301
  4. Liu, W., Mirza, F., Narayanan, A., & Souligna, S. (2018). Is it possible to cure Internet addiction with the Internet? AI & SOCIETY, 1-11. DOI: doi:10.1007%2Fs00146-018-0858-0

2017

  1. Klymchuk, S. (2017). Puzzle-based learning in engineering mathematics: Students’ attitudes. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 48(7), 1106-1119.
    http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2017.1327088
  2. Klymchuk, S., Jovanoski, Z. (2017). Making assumptions in a ballistics model:Students’ perspectives. Teaching Mathematics and its Applications: An International Journalof the IMA, published online 25 July 2017.https://doi.org/10.1093/teamat/hrx012
  3. Maclaren, P., Wilson, D., & Klymchuk, S. (2017). I see what you are doing: Student views on lecturer use of Tablet PCs in the engineering mathematics classroom. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 33(2), 173-188. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.3257
  4. Clear, T. (2017). Meeting Employers Expectations of DevOps Roles: Can Dispositions Be Taught?. ACM Inroads, 8(2), 19-21. doi:10.1145/3078298
  5. Beecham, S., Clear, T., Barr, J., Daniels, M., Oudshoorn, M., & Noll, J. (2017). Preparing tomorrow’s software engineers for work in a global environment. IEEE Software, 34(1), 9-12. doi:10.1109/MS.2017.16
  6. Beecham, S., Clear, T., Damian, D., Barr, J., Noll, J., & Scacchi, W. (2017). How best to teach global software engineering? Educators are divided. IEEE Software, 34(1), 16-19. doi:10.1109/MS.2017.12
  7. Maclaren, P. (2017). How is that done? Student Views on Resources Used Outside the Engineering Classroom. European Journal of Engineering Education. Published online 5 November 2017. doi:10.1080/03043797.2017

2016

  1. Clear, T. (2016). Computer science education -: challenging thinking in the small?. ACM Inroads, 7(2), 31-33. doi:10.1145/2927016
  2. Clear, T., Grundy, J., Pagnucco, M., Padgham, L., Moffat, A., Dobbie, G., . . . Abramson, D. (2016). ERA 2018 Impact and Assessment Discussion Paper Feedback Response from Computing Research and Education Australasia (CoRE) and Australian Council of Deans of ICT (ACDICT). CoRE & ACDICT. Retrieved from http://www.core.edu.au/submissions-and-endorsements
  3. Connor, A. M., Sosa, R., Karmokar, S., Marks, S., Buxton, M., Gribble, A. M., . . . Footit, J. (2016). Exposing core competencies for future creative technologists. In A. M. Connor, & S. Marks (Eds.), Creative Technologies for Multidisciplinary Applications (pp. 373-397). Hershey, PA: IGI Global. doi:10.4018/978-1-5225-0016-2.ch015
  4. Karmokar, S., & Shekar, A. (2016). A Shift in Focus in Engineering Education: Taking into Account the Expanding Roles of Engineers. In E. Bohemia, L. Buck, K. Eriksen, A. Kovacevic, N. Ovesen, & C. Tollestrup (Eds.), Design Education" Collaboration & Cross- Disciplinary. Aalborg, Denmark.
  5. Klymchuk, S. (2016). Analysing university students' abilities in making assumptions in a ballistics model: A case study. Mathematics Teaching Research Journal Online, 8(1-2), 12 pages. Retrieved from http://www.hostos.cuny.edu/mtrj/archives/volume8/issue12/volume8issue12full.pdf
  6. Klymchuk, S., Jovanoski, Z. (2016). Analysing university students' abilities in making assumptions in a ballistics model: A case study. Mathematics Teaching Research Journal Online, 8(1-2), 12 pages. Retrieved from http://www.hostos.cuny.edu/mtrj/archives/volume8/issue12/volume8issue12full.pdf
  7. Singh, H., Karmokar, S., & Tan, F. B. (2016). Using multidisciplinary design principles to improve the website design process. Pacific Asia Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 8(3), 17-44. Retrieved from http://journal.ecrc.nsysu.edu.tw/index.php/pajais/article/view/353

2015

  1. Connor, A. M., Karmokar, S., & Whittington, C. (2015). From STEM to STEAM: Strategies for enhancing engineering & technology education. International Journal of Engineering Pedagogy, 5(2), 37-47. doi:10.3991/ijep.v5i2.4458
  2. Klymchuk, S. (2015). Provocative mathematics questions: Drawing attention to a lack of attention. Teaching Mathematics and Its Applications, 34(2), 63-70. doi:10.1093/teamat/hru022 Retrieved from http://teamat.oxfordjournals.org/content/34/2/63.full.pdf+html
  3. Klymchuk, S. (2015). Solving application problems using mathematical modelling diagrams. Mathematics Teaching Research Journal Online, 7(3), 5 pages. Retrieved from http://www.hostos.cuny.edu/MTRJ/archives/volume7/issue3/volume7issue3full.pdf
  4. Klymchuk, S., & Zverkova, T. (2015). Using common sense in a mathematical modelling task. Mathematics Teaching Research Journal Online, 7(3), 7 pages. Retrieved from http://www.hostos.cuny.edu/MTRJ/archives/volume7/issue3/volume7issue3full.pdf
  5. Sarkar, N.I, Qi, R.and Hossain, A. (2015). "Performance Studies of FTP, Voice and Video over ATM-Wireless Backbone Network". International Journal of Advanced Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing, vol.7, no.3, pp, October-December 2015, IGI Global.
  6. Clear, T. (2015a). Everybody must cut code! Educational imperative, fad or fantasy? ACM Inroads, 6(4), 19-21. doi:10.1145/2822902
  7. Clear, T. (2015b). IT Industry Employers Expectations: Our Graduates Deserve Better! ACM Inroads, 6(2), 20-22. doi:10.1145/2767692
  8. Daniels, M., Cajander, Å., Clear, T., & McDermott, R. (2015). Collaborative Technologies in Global Engineering: New Competencies and Challenges International Journal of Engineering Education, 31(1 (B)), 267-281.
  9. Gilbert, J. (2015). Transforming science education for the Anthropocene—is it possible? Research in Science Education. DOI 10.1007/s11165-015-9498-2.

2014

  1. Klymchuk, S. (2014). Experience with using counterexamples in an introductory calculus class. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology 6 pages, online 23 May. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2014.920533.
  2. Maclaren, P. (2014). The new chalkboard: The role of digital pen technologies in tertiary mathematics teaching. Teaching Mathematics and its Applications, 33(1), 16-26.
  3. Sarkar, N. I. (2014). Enhancing Teaching and Learning Wi-Fi Networking using Limited Resources to Undergraduates. International Journal of Web-Based Learning and Teaching Technologies, 8(4), 1-18. doi:10.4018/ijwltt.2013100101

2013

  1. Goldweber, M., Barr, J., Clear, T., Davoli, R., Mann, S., Patitsas, E., . . . Portnoff, S. (2013). A framework for enhancing the social good in computing education: a values approach. SIGCSE Bulletin Inroads, 4(1), 58 (79 pages). doi:10.1145/2432596.2432616
  2. Klymchuk, S., & Cheng, C. C. (2013). The role of attention in assessment. Mathematics Teaching Research Journal Online, 6(3), 36-47. Retrieved from http://www.hostos.cuny.edu/MTRJ/archives/volume6/issue3/volume6issue3fulll.pdf
  3. Maclaren, P., Singamneni, S., & Wilson, D. I. (2013). Technologies for engineering education. Australian Journal of Multi-disciplinary Engineering, 9(2), 185-192. Retrieved from http://tinyurl.com/TechEngEd13
  4. Sarkar, N.I. (2013). Enhancing Teaching and Learning Wi-Fi Networking using Limited Resources to Undergraduates. International Journal of Web-Based Learning and Teaching Technologies (IJWLTT),  8(4), 1-18, IGI Global Publisher
  5. Sarkar, N. I., & Petrova, K. (2013). Design and Evaluation of a Web-Based Tool for Teaching Computer Network Design to Undergraduates. In N. Karacapilidis, M. Raisinghani, & E. Ng (Eds.), Web-Based and Blended Educational Tools and Innovations (pp. 214-234). IGI Global. doi:10.4018/978-1-4666-2023-0
  6. Sarkar, N.I. (2013) “Enhancing Teaching and Learning Wi-Fi Networking using Limited Resources to Undergraduates” – International Journal of Web-Based Learning and Teaching Technologies (IJWLTT), vol. 8, no. 4, pp.1-18, October-December 2013, IGI Global Publisher.
  7. Sarkar, N.I., Nisar,K., and Chieng, H. (2013) “Modelling and Performance Studies of ATM Networks over Email, FTP, Voice & Video,” International Journal of Information Communication Technologies and Human Development (IJICTHD). vol.5, no.4, 2013.

2012 & Older

  1. Gilbert, J. (2012). Science 2.0 and School Science. New Zealand Science Teacher, (131), 5-9.
  2. Kachapova, F. (2012). A general approach to teaching random variables. Mathematics Teaching-Research Journal, 5(2), 1-16. Retrieved from http://www.hostos.cuny.edu/MTRJ/archives/volume5/volume5issue2full.pdf
  3. Kachapova, F., & Kachapov, I. (2012). Percentage problems in bridging courses. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 43(5), 654-663. doi:10.1080/0020739X.2011.618554
  4. Kachapova, F., & Kachapov, I. (2012). Students' misconceptions about random variables. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 43(7), 963-971. doi:10.1080/0020739X.2011.644332
  5. Klymchuk, S., & Kachapova, F. (2012). Paradoxes and counterexamples in teaching and learning of probability at university. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 43(6), 803-811. doi:10.1080/0020739X.2011.633631
  6. Thomas, M. O. J., & Klymchuk, S. (2012). The school-tertiary interface in mathematics: Teaching style and assessment practice. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 24(3), 283-300. doi:10.1007/s13394-012-0051-6
  7. Klymchuk, S. (2012). Using counter-examples in teaching and learning of calculus: Students' attitudes and performance. Mathematics Teaching Research Journal Online, 5(4), 30 pages. Retrieved from http://www.hostos.cuny.edu/MTRJ/archives/volume5/volume5issue4full.pdf
  8. Clear, T., Hitchcock, L., & Berglund, A. (2011). Global Intercultural Collaboration: New Educational Directions in Global Collaborations Between Cultures. New Zealand Journal of Applied Computing and Information Technology, 15(1), I1. Retrieved from http://www.citrenz.ac.nz/jacit/JACIT1501/2011Clear_GlobalInterculturalCollaboration.html
  9. Gilbert, J. (2011). School science is like wrestling with an octopus. New Zealand Science Teacher 126, pp.29-31.
  10. Kachapova, F. (2011). Teaching percentages through the table method. Mathematics Teaching-Research Journal, 5(1), 32-49. Retrieved from http://www.hostos.cuny.edu/MTRJ/archives/volume5/volume5issue1full.pdf
  11. Kachapova, F., & Kachapov, I. (2011). Applying change of variable to calculus problems. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 388-396. doi:10.1080/0020739X.2010.526251
  12. Kachapova, F., & Kachapov, I.. (2011). Percentage problems in bridging courses. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 1-10. doi:10.1080/0020739X.2011.618554
  13. Kachapova, F., & Kachapov, I. (2011). Students' misconceptions about random variables. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 1-9. doi:10.1080/0020739X.2011.644332
  14. Klymchuk, S., Gruenwald, N., & Jovanoski, Z. (2011). University lecturers' views on the transition from secondary to tertiary education in mathematics: An international survey. Mathematics Teaching-Research Journal Online (MTRJ), 5(1), 101-128. Retrieved from http://www.hostos.cuny.edu/MTRJ/archives/volume5/volume5issue1full.pdf
  15. Klymchuk, S., & Kachapova, F. (2011). Paradoxes and counterexamples in teaching and learning of probability at university. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 1-9. doi:10.1080/0020739X.2011.633631
  16. Klymchuk, S., Kachapova, F., Schott, D., Sauerbier, G., & Kachapov, I. (2011). Using paradoxes and counterexamples in teaching probability: A parallel study. Mathematics Teaching-Research Journal Online (MTRJ), 5(1), 50-70. Retrieved from http://www.hostos.cuny.edu/MTRJ/archives/volume5/volume5issue1full.pdf
  17. Klymchuk, S., & Thomas, M. O. J. (2011). The influence of attention on mathematical knowledge of teachers and lecturers: A comparison. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 42(7), 1011-1020. doi:10.1080/0020739X.2011.607246
  18. Sarkar, N. I.., & Petrova, K.. (2011). Design and evaluation of a web-based tool for teaching computer network design to undergraduates. International Journal of Web-based Learning and Teaching with Technologies, 6(4), 39-59. Retrieved from http://www.irma-international.org/viewtitle/62852/
  19. Daniels, M., Cajander, Å., Pears, A., & Clear, T. (2010). Engineering Education Research in Practice: Evolving Use of Open Ended Group Projects as a Pedagogical Strategy for Developing Skills in Global Collaboration. International Journal of Engineering Education, 26(4), 795-806.
  20. Gruenwald, N., Sauerbier, G., Narayanan, A., Klymchuk, S., & Zverkova, T. (2010). Applications in unusual contexts in engineering mathematics: Students' attitudes. Mathematics Teaching-Research Journal Online, 4(1), 52-67. Retrieved from http://www.hostos.cuny.edu/MTRJ/archives/volume4/volume4issue1full.pdf
  21. Kachapova, F., & Kachapov, I. (2010). Measuring monotony in two-dimensional samples. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and  Technology, 41(3), 418-427. doi:10.1080/00207390903477418
  22. Kachapova, F., & Kachapov, I. (2010). Orthogonal Projection in Teaching Regression and Financial Mathematics. Journal of Statistics Education, 18(1). Retrieved from http://www.amstat.org/publications/jse/v18n1/kachapova.pdf
  23. Klymchuk, S., Zverkova, T., Gruenwald, N., & Sauerbier, G. (2010). University students' difficulties in solving application problems in calculus: Student perspectives. Mathematics Education Research Journal (MERJ), 22(2), 81-91. doi:10.1007/BF03217567
  24. Hong, Y., Kerr, S., Klymchuk, S., McHardy, J., Murphy, P., Spencer, S., Thomas, M., & Watson, P. (2009). A comparison of teacher and lecturer perspectives on the transition from secondary to tertiary mathematics education. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 40(7), 877-889. doi:10.1080/00207390903223754
  25. Philpott, A., Clear, T., & Whalley, J. (2009). Understanding student performance on an algorithm simulation task: Implications for guided learning. SIGCSE Bulletin Inroads, 41(1), 408-412.
  26. Sarkar, N. I., & Petrova, K. (2009). Miniproject-based learning as an effective tool for teaching computer networks to graduate students. International Journal of Information and Communication Technologies Education, 5(1), 1-16. doi:10.4018/jicte.2009010101
  27. Kachapova, F., & Kachapov, I. (2008). Geometrical Approach to Random Variables. Mathematics Teaching-Research Journal (MTRJ), 2(3), 41-47. Retrieved from http://www.hostos.cuny.edu/MTRJ/archives/volume2/issue3/volume2issue3full.pdf
  28. Klymchuk, S., Zverkova, T., Gruenwald, N., & Sauerbier, G. (2008). Increasing engineering students' awareness to environment through innovative teaching of mathematical modelling. Teaching Mathematics and Its Applications, 27(3), 123-130. doi:10.1093/teamat/hrn007
  29. Gruenwald, N., Sauerbier, G., Zverkova, T., & Klymchuk, S. (2008). Teaching non-traditional applications in engineering mathematics: A case study. Mathematics Teaching-Research Journal Online, 2(2), 6 pages. Retrieved from http://www.hostos.cuny.edu/mtrj/archives/volume2/issue2/volume2issue2full.pdf
  30. Black, M., Kachapova, F., Klymchuk, S., & Kachapov, I. (2007). Probability counter-examples and paradoxes as a teaching strategy. Mathematics and Informatics Quarterly, 17(3/4), 154-159.
  31. Gilbert, J. (2007). Catching the Knowledge Wave? The "knowledge society" and the future of public education. Education Canada, 47(3), pp.4-8.
  32. Gilbert, J. (2007). Knowledge, the disciplines, and learning in the digital age. Education Research Policy and Practice, 6(2), pp.115–122.
  33. Gruenwald, N., Sauerbier, G., Zverkova, T., & Klymchuk, S. (2007). Unusual applications in engineering mathematics: Students' attitudes. The New Zealand Mathematics Magazine, 44(3), 5-11.
  34. Kachapova, F., Black, M., & Kachapov, I. (2007). Effective Procedures in Teaching Mathematics. Mathematics Teaching-Research Journal (MTRJ), 2(1), 89-104. Retrieved from http://www.hostos.cuny.edu/MTRJ/archives/volume2/issue1/volume2issue1full.pdf
  35. Kachapova, F., Black, M., Klymchuk, S., & Kachapov, I. (2007). Counter-examples and paradoxes in teaching mathematical statistics: A case study. Mathematics Teaching-Research Journal Online (MTRJ), 2(1), 12 pages. Retrieved from http://www.hostos.cuny.edu/mtrj/archives/volume2/issue1/volume2issue1full.pdf
  36. Sarkar, N.I. & Craig, T. (2007) A Low-Cost PIC Unit for Teaching Computer Hardware Fundamentals to Undergraduates. ACM SIGCSE Bulletin, 39(2), pp.88-91, ISSN: 0097-8418.
  37. Gruenwald, N., & Klymchuk, S. (2006). Counter-examples in mathematics. Mathematics and Information Quarterly, 16(3/4), 73-77.
  38. Gruenwald, N., Sauerbier, G., Zverkova, T., & Klymchuk, S. (2006). Bestand und Nachhaltigkeit in der Mathematischen Modellierung für Ingenieurstudenten (Survival and sustainability issues in mathematical modelling for engineering students. Global Journal of Engineering Education - German Edition, 10(3), 293-298. Retrieved from http://www.wiete.com.au/journals/GJEE/Publish/Vol.10,No.3/Klymchuk.pdf
  39. Giddings, L. S., Campbell, S., & Maclaren, P. (2006). Going online to learn health sciences research methods: The student experience. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 22, 251-267.
  40. Sarkar, N. I. (2006). Teaching TCP/IP networking using practical laboratory exercises. International Journal of Information and Communication Technology Education, 2(4), 39-50.
  41. Sarkar, N.I. (2006). Teaching Computer Networking Fundamentals Using Practical Laboratory Exercises. IEEE Transactions on Education, 49(2), 285-291, ISSN: 0018-9359.
  42. Sarkar, N. I., & Craig, T. M. (2006). Teaching computer hardware and organization using PIC-based projects. International Journal of Electrical Engineering Education (IJEEE, 43(2), 150-163.
  43. Sarkar, N.I. & Craig, T.M. (2006) Teaching Computer Hardware and Organization using PIC-based Projects. International Journal of Electrical Engineering Education (IJEEE), 43(2), 150-163, Manchester University Press, U.K. ISSN: 0020-7209.
  44. Sarkar, N. I., & Craig, T. M. (2006). Teaching wireless communication and networking fundamentals using Wi-Fi projects. IEEE Transactions on Education, 49(1), 98-104.
  45. Klymchuk, S. (2005). Counter-examples in teaching/learning of calculus: students' performance. International Newsletter on the Teaching and Learning of Mathematical Proof, 9 pages. Retrieved from http://www.lettredelapreuve.it/OldPreuve/Newsletter/06Hiver/Klymchuk-NZMM.pdf
  46. Klymchuk, S. (2005). Counter-examples in teaching/learning of calculus: Students' performance. The New Zealand Mathematics Magazine, 42(1), 31-38.
  47. Gruenwald, N., Sauerbier, G., Zverkova, T., & Klymchuk, S. (2005). Mathematische Modelle der Ökologie im ersten Studienjahr Ingenieurmathematik (Mathematical models of ecology in first-year engineering mathematics). Global Journal of Engineering Education – German Edition, 9(3), 237-244. Retrieved from http://www.wiete.com.au/journals/GJEE/Publish/vol9no3/Gruenwald+.pdf
  48. Gruenwald, N., Sauerbier, G., Zverkova, T., & Klymchuk, S. (2005). Using mathematical models of ecology in teaching first-year engineering mathematics. The New Zealand Mathematics Magazine, 42(3), 11-23.

Back to top

Refereed papers in conference proceedings

2020

  1. Anderson, T., Moir, T, Nates, R.J., Hooper, P., Whittington, C., Protheroe, M., Hadrup, M. and Beckerleg, M. (2020). Trying-out digital technologies in trying times: A collection of observations from a collegial adventure during Covid-19. In Proceedings of 2020 Australasian Association for Engineering Education (AAEE) Virtual Conference: Disrupting business as usual in engineering education, 6 – 9 Dec 2020.
  2. Clear, A., Clear, T., Vichare, A., Charles, T., Frezza, S., Gutica, M., . . . Szynkiewicz, J. (2020). Developing competency statements for computer science curricula: The way ahead. In ITiCSE '20: Proceedings of the 2020 ACM Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education (pp. 515-516). Trondheim. doi:10.1145/3341525.3394995
  3. Klymchuk, S. & Sangwin, C. (2020). Provocations in mathematics: Teachers’ attitudes. In Di Paola, B., Palhares, P. (Eds.) Proceedings of the 71st Conference of the International Commission for the Study and Improvement of Mathematics Education (CIEAEM-71), special issue No. 7, 2020 of Quaderni di Ricerca in Didattica (Mathematics) (pp. 247-256). Palermo, Italy: University of Palermo. http://math.unipa.it/%7Egrim/quaderno_2020_numspec_7.htm
  4. Klymchuk, S. & Sangwin, C. (2020). A new type of questions for teaching and assessing critical thinking in mathematics. In Gomez Chova, L., Lopez Martinez, A., Candel Torres, I. (Eds.) Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Education and New Learning Technologies (EDULEARN20) (pp. 2348-2355). Valencia, Spain: IATED Academy. doi:10.21125/edulearn.2020; https://iated.org/concrete3/session_detail.php?session_id=4394
  5. Sarkar, N.I. and Petrova, K. (2020). WebLan-Designer (v3) over the Past Six Years: Motivation, Benefits, Evaluation and Reflection. In Proceedings of 2020 Australasian Association for Engineering Education (AAEE) Virtual Conference: Disrupting business as usual in engineering education, 6 – 9 Dec 2020, Sydney, Australia.

2019

  1. Evans, T., Klymchuk, S. & Thomas, M. (2019). Developing employability attributes and capabilities: Regular use of non-routine problem solving in STEM instruction. In Program and Abstracts of the Higher Education Research and Development Society Australasia Conference (HERDSA). Auckland, New Zealand. https://www.herdsa2019.auckland.ac.nz/program/parallel-sessions-day-two/developing-employability-attributes-and-capabilities-regular-use-of-non-routine-problem-solving-in-stem-instruction/
  2. Klymchuk, S. & Sangwin, C. (2019). A new type of questions for teaching and assessing critical thinking in mathematics. In Programme and Abstracts of the New Zealand Mathematical Society Colloquium (pp. 28-29). Palmerston North, New Zealand. https://nzmathsoc.org.nz/downloads/miscellaneous/NZMS_Colloquium_2019_programme.pdf
  3. Klymchuk, S. & Wilson, D. (2019). Integrating pen-enabled tablet PCs in teaching engineering mathematics. In Rogerson, A., Morska, J. (Eds.) Proceedings of the 15th International Conference of the Mathematics Education for the Future Project “Theory and Practice: An Interface or a Great Divide?” (pp. 293-298). Maynooth, Ireland: WTM, Munster. https://directorymathsed.net/public/Ireland/
  4. Sarkar, N. I., Gul, S. & Anderton, B. (2019). Gigabit Ethernet with Wireless Extension: OPNET Modelling and Performance Study. In Proceedings of the 33rd International Conference on Information Networking (ICOIN 2019), pp. 216-221, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. doi:10.1109/ICOIN.2019.8718141
  5. Spooner, K. (2019). Authentic mathematical modelling behaviours for secondary school students. In Rogerson, A., Morska, J. (Eds.) Proceedings of the 15th International Conference of the Mathematics Education for the Future Project “Theory and Practice: An Interface or a Great Divide?” (pp. 548-552). Maynooth, Ireland: WTM, Munster. https://directorymathsed.net/public/Ireland/
  6. Whittington, C., Anderson, T. (2019). Transformative Change in Engineering Education. In Proceedings of the Australasian Association for Engineering Conference - 2019. Brisbane.
  7. Chanane, N., Mirza, F., & Naeem, M. A. (2019). mHealth: A qualitative approach towards improving medication adherence. In 30th Australasian Conference on Information Systems (ACIS’19).
  8. Christopher J. Rapson, Boon-Chong Seet, M. Asif Naeem, Jeong Eun Lee, and Reinhard Klette. (2019). A performance comparison of deep learning methods for real-time localisation of vehicle lights in videoframes. In IEEE Intelligent Transportation Systems Conference (ITSC19).
  9. Adi Darliansyah, Herman Masindano Wandabwa, M. Asif Naeem, Farhaan Mirza, and Russel Pears. (2019). Long-term trends in public sentiment in Indian demonetisation policy. In Intelligent Technologies and Applications, pp. 65–75, Springer.
  10. M. Asif Naeem, Omer Aziz, and Noreen Jamil. Optimising HYBRIDJOIN to process semi-stream data in near-real-time data warehousing. (2019). In CONF-IRM Proceedings. Association for Information Systems.
  11. Herman Wandabwa, M. Asif Naeem, Farhaan Mirza, and Russel Pears. (2019). Topical expressivity in short texts.  In CONF-IRM 2019 Proceedings. Association for Information Systems.
  12. Gul. S. and Sarkar, N.I. (2019). The Effect of Propagation Models on IEEE 802.11n over 2.4 GHz and 5 GHz in Noisy Channels: A Simulation Study. In Proceedings of the 11th EAI International Conference on ad Hoc Networks (ADHOCNETS 2019), pp 113-121, Queenstown, New Zealand.

2018

  1. Spooner, K. (2018). Student Learning Processes for Mathematical Modelling – An Engineering Lecturer’s Viewpoint. In Proceedings 2016 Learning and Teaching in Computing and Engineering (Latice 2018).  Auckland.
  2. Evans, T., Klymchuk, S. & Thomas, M. (2018). Puzzle-based learning in university
    mathematics: students’ perspectives. In Bergqvist, E., Österholm, M., Granberg, C., &
    Sumpter, L. (Eds.). Proceedings of the 42nd Conference of the International Group for
    the Psychology of Mathematics Education (PME-42) Vol. 5 (p.46). Umeå, Sweden: PME
  3. Naseer, S., Liu, W., Sarkar, N. I., Chong, P. H. J., Lai, E., Ma, M., … Manzoor, S. (2018). A Sustainable Marriage of Telcos and Transp in the Era of Big Data: Are We Ready? In P. H. J. Chong, B.-C. Seet, M. Chai, & S. U. Rehman (Eds.), Smart Grid and Innovative Frontiers in Telecommunications (pp. 210–219). Springer International Publishing.
  4. Latapu, P. P., Lutui, R., Vaipuna, S., Moala, K., Fonua, S., Liu, W., … Bagula, A. (2018). Bridging the digital divide in Tonga through a sustainable multi-tenancy broadband infrastructure: Are we ready? In 2018 IEEE International Conference on Environmental Engineering (EE) (pp. 1–6). Milan: IEEE. doi:10.1109/EE1.2018.8385273

2017

  1. Klymchuk, S. & Spooner, K. (2017). Application problems vs pure mathematics questions: Students’ perspectives. In Online proceedings of the international conference Mathematics Education beyond 16: Pathways and Transitions(10 pages). Birmingham, UK. https://ima.org.uk/2996/mathematics-education-beyond-16-pathways-transitions/
  2. Andrew Luxton-Reilly, Brett A. Becker, Yingjun Cao, Roger McDermott, Claudio Mirolo, Andreas Mühling, Andrew Petersen, Kate Sanders, Simon, and Jacqueline Whalley. 2018. Developing Assessments to Determine Mastery of Programming Fundamentals. In Proceedings of the 2017 ITiCSE Conference on Working Group Reports(ITiCSE-WGR '17). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 47-69. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3174781.3174784
  3. Jacqueline Whalley, Michael Goldweber, and Harley Ogier. 2017. Student values and interests in capstone project selection. In Proceedings of the Nineteenth Australasian Computing Education Conference(ACE '17). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 90-94. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3013499.3013508
  4. Ciampi, M., Clear, A., Clear, T., & Imbrie, P. K. (2017). Welcome from the program chairs. In Proceedings - Frontiers in Education Conference, FIEVol. 2017-October (pp. 8). doi:10.1109/FIE.2017.8190431
  5. Beecham, S., Clear, T., Noll, S., & Mani, V. S. (2017). Open Space: GSE-ED panel - Synergy-zing in the GSE community: How academia and industry can educate each other. In D. Cruzes, & A. Sharma (Eds.), Proceedings 2017 IEEE 12th International Conference on Global Software Engineering(pp. xvi-xvii). Buenos Aires, Argentina: IEEE.
  6. Hussain, W., Clear, T., & MacDonell, S. (2017). Emerging trends for global devops: A New Zealand perspective. In D. Cruzes, & A. Sharma (Eds.), Proceedings 2017 IEEE 12th International Conference on Global Software Engineering(pp. 21-30). Buenos Aires, Argentina: IEEE. doi:10.1109/ICGSE.2017.16
  7. Beecham, S., Clear, T., & Noll, J. (2017). Do we teach the right thing? A comparison of global software engineering education and practice. In D. Cruzes, & A. Sharma (Eds.), Proceedings 2017 IEEE 12th International Conference on Global Software Engineering(pp. 11-20). Buenos Aires, Argentina: IEEE. doi:10.1109/ICGSE.2017.8
  8. Erkan, A., Barr, J., Clear, T., Izu, C., del Alamo, C., Mohammed, H., & Nadimpali, M. (2017). Developing a holistic understanding of systems and algorithms through research papers. In J. Sheard, & A. Korhonen (Eds.), Proceedings of the 2017 ITiCSE Conference on Working Group Reports(pp. 86-104). Bologna, Italy: ACM. doi:10.1145/3174781.3174786
  9. Whalley, J., Goldweber, M., & Ogier, H. 2017. Student values and interests in capstone project selection. In Proceedings of the Nineteenth Australasian Computing Education Conference (ACE '17). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 90-94. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3013499.3013508
  10. Karmokar S, Whittington C (2017). STEM for Women and Ethnic Communities in Aotearoa (New Zealand). Proceedings of the 28th Australasian Association for Engineering Education conference. Sydney, Australia. pp. 566-575. Publisher URL
  11. Karmokar S. (2017). Changing Role of Modern Engineers and Social Responsibility. Proceedings of the 28th Australasian Association for Engineering Education conference. Sydney, Australia. pp. 630-638. Publisher URL
  12. Whittington C, Anderson T, Conner A. (2017).  Embedding authentic practice based learning in engineering undergraduate courses 28th Australasian Association for Engineering Education Conference (AEEE 2017) Order of Proceedings. Australasian Association for Engineering Education. 85-95.   Publisher URL

2016

  1. Connor, A. M., & Karmokar, S. (2016). Re-Engineering Design Through Multiple Disciplinary Lenses. In E. Boherima, L. Buck, K. Eriksen, A. Kovacevic, & N. Ovesen (Eds.), 18th International Conference on Engineering and Product Design Education (pp. 168-178). Th Design Society. Retrieved from https://www.designsociety.org/publication/39076/re-engineering_design_through_multiple_disciplinary_lenses
  2. Karmokar, S. (2016). Managing Super Diverse Women Entrepreneurs in Aotearoa New Zealand. In The 11th European Conference on Innovation and Entrepreneurship (pp. 365-372). Jyväskylä, Finland.
  3. Karmokar, S., & Rive, P. (2016). Design Thinking Methods and Creative Technologies in Virtual Worlds. In The 11th European Conference on Innovation and Entrepreneurship (pp. 635-645). Jyväskylä, Finland.
  4. Klymchuk, S. (2016). Enhancing General Thinking Skills through Puzzles, Paradoxes and Sophisms: Engineering Students’ Perspectives. In Online proceedings of the 3rd Mathematics Education and Contemporary Theories conference (MECT-3) (9 pages). Manchester, UK: Manchester Metropolitan University. Retrieved from http://www.esri.mmu.ac.uk/mect3/papers-list.php
  5. McDermott, R., Zarb, M., Daniels, M., Cajander, Å., & Clear, T. (2016). Motivation, Optimal Experience and Flow in First Year Computing Science. In J. Carter, & I. Tupac (Eds.), Proceedings of the 2016 ACM Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education (pp. 206-211). Arequipa, Peru: ACM. doi:10.1145/2899415.2899474
  6. Spooner, K., & Clear, T. (2016). A Foundation Programme Preparing Students for Future Study in Computing and Engineering Degrees. In Proceedings 2016 Learning and Teaching in Computing and Engineering (LaTICE 2016) (pp. 66-70). Mumbai, India: IEEE.
  7. Anderson T, Whittington C, Li X. (2016). Classes to passes: Is class attendance a determinant of grades in undergraduate engineering subjects? 27th Australasian Association for Engineering Education Conference, Coff's Harbour, Australia, 04 Dec 2016 - 07 Dec 2016. Proceedings Editors: Smith ST, Lim YY, Bahadori A, Lake N, Vasquez Padilla R, Rose A, Doust K. Proceedings, AAEE2016 Conference. Southern Cross University. 7 pages.
  8. Whittington C. (2016). Case study: The push for cultural change across departments with inherently traditional pedagogies – the challenges, solutions and benefits New Generation Learning Conference 2016, Auckland, 28 Nov 2016 - 30 Nov 2016 .  Publisher URL

2015

  1. Klymchuk, S., Maclaren, P., & Wilson, D. (2015). Lecturers' attitudes towards integrating pen-enabled tablet PCs in teaching engineering mathematics. In S. Carreira, & N. Amado (Eds.), Online Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Technology in Mathematics Teaching (ICTMT12) (pp. 530-532). Faro, Portugal: University of Algarve. Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/10400.1/6081
  2. Klymchuk, S. (2015). Using puzzles, paradoxes, provocations and sophisms for enhancing teaching and learning of engineering mathematics. In Book of Abstracts of the 12th Engineering Mathematics and Applications Conference (EMAC-12) (p. 37). Adelaide, Australia: University of South Australia.
  3. Klymchuk, S. (2015). Increasing the retention rate in tertiary STEM subjects by enhancing students' engagement. In Online Programme and Abstracts of Tertiary Education Research New Zealand Conference 2015 (TERNZ-2015) (1 page). Auckland, New Zealand: Auckland University of Technology. Retrieved from https://guidebook.com/guide/40696/event/11418631/
  4. Klymchuk, S., Jovanoski, Z. (2015). Analysing university students' abilities in making assumptions in a ballistic model: A case study. In Conference Contributions of the 17th International Conference on Teaching Mathematical Modelling and Applications (ICTMA-17) (p. 57). Nottingham, UK: University of Nottingham.
  5. Clear, T. (2015b). 'Follow the moon' development: writing a systematic literature review on Global Software Engineering Education [Keynote Presentation]. In P. Kinnunen & J. Sheard (Eds.), Proceedings of the 15th Baltic Sea Conference on Computing Education Research, (Koli Calling) (pp. 1-4). New York: ACM. doi:10.1145/2828959.2835019
  6. Clear, T., Beecham, S., Barr, J., Daniels, M., McDermott, R., Oudshoorn, M., . . . Noll, J. (2015). Challenges and Recommendations for the Design and Conduct of Global Software Engineering Courses: A Systematic Review. In N. Ragonis & P. Kinnunen (Eds.), Proceedings of the Working Group Reports of the 2015 on Innovation & Technology in Computer Science Education Conference (pp. 1-39). New York: ACM. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2858796.2858797
  7. Daniels, M., Cajander, Å., Eckerdal, A., Lind, M., Nylén, A., Clear, T., & McDermott, R. (2015). Competencies for Paradigm Shift 'Survival'. In S. Purzer, M. Mina, & A. Korhonen (Eds.), 45th ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference. (pp. 1424-1429). Seattle, Washington: IEEE. doi:10.1109/FIE.2015.7344255
  8. Liu, W., Goldweber, M., & Clear, T. (2015). A Definition for a Sustainable Computing Educator. In M. Verhaart, A. Sarkar, R. Tomlinson, & E. Erturk (Eds.), 6th Annual Conference of Computing and Information Technology Research and Education (CITRENZ2015) (pp. 55-59). Hamilton, New Zealand: CITRENZ. Retrieved from http://www.citrenz.ac.nz/2015-proceedings/
  9. Peters, A., Hussain, W., Cajander, A., Clear, T., & Daniels, M. (2015a, 14 October). Preparing software engineering students for practice in today's global settings [Poster]. presented at the meeting of the Konferensen i universitetspedagogisk utveckling - The Conference for University Pedagogical Development Uppsala, Sweden. Retrieved from https://mp.uu.se/documents/432512/1245136/Abstracts_150924.pdf/1ba60692-4f48-4f70-8aec-41c031930057
  10. Peters, A., Hussain, W., Cajander, A., Clear, T., & Daniels, M. (2015b). Preparing the Global Software Engineer. In M. Nordio & B. Al-Ani (Eds.), Proceedings 2015 IEEE 10th International Conference on Global Software Engineering (pp. 61-70). Los Alamitos, California: IEEE. doi:10.1109/ICGSE.2015.20
  11. Simon, Sheard, J., D'Souza, D., Lopez, M., Luxton-Reilly, A., Putro, I.H., Robbins, P., Teague, D. and Whalley, J. (2015). How (not) to write an introductory programming exam. In Proc. 17th Australasian Computing Education Conference (ACE 2015) – CRPIT, 160, (pp.137-146), Darlinghurst, Australia, Australia: Australian Computer Society, Inc. Retrieved from http://crpit.com/confpapers/CRPITV160Simon.pdf

2014

  1. Kasto, N., Whalley, J., Philpott, A., & Whalley, D. (2014). Solution Spaces. In Proc. 16th Australasian Computing Education Conference – CRPIT, 148 (pp. 133–137). Darlinghurst, Australia, Australia: Australian Computer Society, Inc. Retrieved from http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=2667490.2667506
  2. Spooner, K. (2014). Preliminaries for a first year course on Modelling. Proceedings of The Future of Mathematics Education in a Connected World Conference in print. Montenegro.
  3. Whalley, J., & Kasto, N. (2014). A Qualitative Think-aloud Study of Novice Programmers’ Code Writing Strategies. In Proc. of the 2014 Conference on Innovation & Technology in Computer Science Education (ITiCSE 2014) (pp. 279–284). New York, NY, USA: ACM. http://doi.org/10.1145/2591708.2591762
  4. Whalley, J., & Kasto, N. (2014). How Difficult Are Novice Code Writing Tasks?: A Software Metrics Approach. In Proc. 16th Australasian Computing Education Conference – CRPIT, 148 (pp. 105–112). Darlinghurst, Australia, Australia: Australian Computer Society, Inc. Retrieved from http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=2667490.2667503

2013

  1. Klymchuk, S., & Cheng, C. (2013). The impact of attention on assessment. In M. Inprasitha (Ed.), Innovations and Exemplary Practices in Mathematics Education, Proceedings of the 6th East Asia Regional Conference on Mathematics Education (EARCOME-6) Vol. 2 (pp. 354-362). Thailand: Center for Research in Mathematics Education (CRME), Khon Kaen University.
  2. Klymchuk, S., & Zverkova, T. (2013). The role of attention in the praxis of knowledge of school mathematics teachers. In Online proceedings of the 2nd Mathematics Education and Contemporary Theories conference (MECT-2) (8 pages). Manchester, UK. Retrieved from http://www.esri.mmu.ac.uk/mect2/papers.php
  3. Maclaren, P. (2013). The new chalkboard: The role of digital pen technologies in tertiary mathematics teaching. In E. Faggiano, & A. Montone (Eds.), ICTMT 11: 11th International Conference on Technology in MAthematics Teaching: Conference Proceedings (pp. 180-186). Bari, Italy.
  4. Maclaren, P., & Wilson, D. I. (2013). Redeveloping a Signature Pedagogy for Engineering: Responding to new spaces and new technologies. In S. Frielick (Ed.), HERDSA 2013: The place of learning and teaching. Auckland, New Zealand. Retrieved from http://conference.herdsa.org.au/2013
  5. Sanders, K., Ahmadzadeh, M., Clear, T., Edwards, S. H., Goldweber, M., Johnson, C., . . . Spacco, J. (2013). The Canterbury QuestionBank: Building a Repository of Multiple-Choice CS1 and CS2 Questions. In I. Utting, & A. Clear (Eds.), Proceedings of the ITiCSE working group reports conference on Innovation and technology in computer science education-working group reports (ITiCSE -WGR '13) (pp. 33-51). New York: ACM. doi:10.1145/2543882.2543885
  6. Sarkar, N.I, and Mussa, O. (2013). “The Effect of People Movement on Wi-Fi Link Throughput in Indoor Propagation Environments” – in Proceedings of the 2013 IEEE TENCON Spring, 17-19 April, Sydney, Australia, pp 598-602
  7. Sheard, J., Simon., Carbone, A., Chinn, D., Clear, T., Corney, M., . . . Teague, D. (2013). How difficult are exams? A framework for assessing the complexity of introductory programming exams. In A. Carbone, & J. Whalley (Eds.), Proceedings of the Fifteenth Australasian Computing Education Research Conference (ACE 2013) Vol. 136 (pp. 145-154). Sydney: ACS. Retrieved from http://www.crpit.com/Vol136.html
  8. Tong, M. J., & Clear, T. (2013). A Reflection on the First Run of the Runestone Project at Tongji University: Observations on Cross Cultural Distributed Teams vs Face to Face Teams. In A. Pears (Ed.), Proceedings 2013 Learning and Teaching in Computing and Engineering (LaTICE 2013) (pp. 148-153). Macau, Macau: IEEE.
  9. Robotham, A. J., Nates, R. J., Raine, J., & White, D. (2013). Reflections on the Challenge of Developing Professional Engineering Designers and Engineering Design Technologists – A New Zealand Perspective. In U. Lindemann, S. Venkataraman, Y. S. Kim, & S. W. Lee (Eds.), International Conference on Engineering Design 2013. Seoul, Korea.
  10. Wilson, D. I., & Maclaren, P. (2013). From Chalk Talk to Tablet Talk: Pedagogies for Control Engineering. In A. Rossiter (Ed.), 10th IFAC Symposium on Advances in Control Education (pp. 144-149). Sheffield, UK: International Federation of Automatic Control.

2012 & Older

  1. Cajander, Å., Daniels, M., Cullhed, M., Clear, T., McDermott, R., & Laxer, C. (2012). Categorizing How Students Use Collaborative
Technologies in a Globally Distributed Project. In R. Bailey, A. Holmes, S. Frezza, & L. Perez (Eds.), 2012 Frontiers in Education Conference Proceedings (pp. 1325-1330). Piscataway, New Jersey: IEEE. Retrieved from http://fie2012.org/
  2. Clear, T., & Clear, A. (2012). PBRF 2012 and the Nature of Degree Teaching. In M. Lopez, & M. Verhaart (Eds.), Proceedings of the 3rd Annual Conference of Computing and Information Technology Research and Education (CITRENZ2012) (pp. 22-26). Christchurch. Retrieved from http://www.citrenz.ac.nz/?page_id=784
  3. Clear, T., Hussain, W., & MacDonell, S. (2012). The Many Facets of Distance and Space: the Mobility of Actors in Globally Distributed Project Teams. In E. Carmel, & R. Solingen (Eds.), Proceedings of the 7th IEEE International Conference on Global Software Engineering (ICGSE), 2012 (pp. 144-148). Los Alamitos, California: IEEE Computer Society.
  4. Goldweber, M., Barr, J., Clear, T., Davoli, R., Mann, S., Patitsas, E., . . . Portnoff, S. (2012). A Framework for Enhancing the Social Good in Computing Education: A Values Approach. In L. Adams, & N. Ragonis (Eds.), Proceedings of the Final Reports on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education 2012 Working Groups (ITiCSE-WGR'12) (pp. 16-28). New York: ACM. doi:10.1145/2426636.2426639
  5. Fraser, A. R., & Maclaren, P. (2012). Patterns of Instruction: Using Screencasts in the Teaching of Textile Design. In ascilite 2012. Wellington.
  6. Klymchuk, S., Zverkova, T., Gruenwald, N., & Sauerbier, G. (2012). University students' difficulties in solving application problems in calculus: Students' perspectives. In G. Rodriguez (Ed.), Proceedings of the 16th conference of the Mathematics Working Group (MWG) of the European Society for Engineering Education (E-format) (6 pages). Salamanca, Spain.
  7. Klymchuk, S., & Zverkova, T. (2012). Using counterexamples in teaching & learning of calculus. In Proceedings of the International Colloquium The Didactics of Mathematics: Approaches and Issues - A Hommage to Michèle Artigue (E-format)
    (3 pages). Paris, France. Retrieved from https://docs.google.com/file/d/0B7H9DyVUr48lTVNiRk5zZ1lhQ00/edit?pli=1
  8. McDermott, R., Daniels, M., Cajander, Å., Clear, T., Cullhed, M., & Laxer, C. (2012). Student Reflections on Collaborative Technology in a Globally Distributed Student Project. In R. Bailey, A. Holmes, S. Frezza, & L. Perez (Eds.), 2012 Frontiers in Education Conference Proceedings (pp. 365-370). Piscataway, New Jersey: IEEE. Retrieved from http://fie2012.org/
  9. Maclaren, P., Singamneni, S., & Wilson, D. I. (2012). Technologies for Engineering Education.. In S. Singamneni (Ed.), Proceedings of the 11th Global Congress on Manufacturing and Management (GCMM2012). Auckland.
  10. Sarkar, N. I. (2012). Best Practices and Future Trends in CSE Education. In 15th International Conference on Computer and Informantion Technology (ICCIT 2012). Chittagong, Bangladesh: IEEE Xplore. Retrieved from http://iccit2012.org/
  11. Simon., Sheard, J., Carbone, A., Chinn, D., Laakso, M. -J., Clear, T., . . . Warburton, G. (2012). Introductory programming: examining the exams. In M. DeRaadt, & A. Carbone (Eds.), Proceedings of the Fourteenth Australasian Computing Education Research Conference (ACE 2012) Vol. 123 (pp. 61-70). Melbourne, Australia: ACS. Retrieved from http://www.crpit.com/confpapers/CRPITV123Simon.pdf
  12. Thota, N., Berglund, A., & Clear, T. (2012). Illustration of Paradigm Pluralism in Computing Education Research. In M. DeRaadt, & A. Carbone (Eds.), Proceedings of the Fourteenth Australasian Computing Education Research Conference (ACE 2012) Vol. 123 (pp. 61-70). Melbourne, Australia: ACS. Retrieved from http://www.crpit.com/confpapers/CRPITV123Thota.pdf
  13. Yan, W., Li, C. , Ma, J., Ma, S. & Truong H. (2012). m-LTE: A Mobile-Based Learning and Teaching Interactive Environment. In IEEE International Conference on Teaching, Assessment, and Learning for Engineering (TALE) 2012. Hong Kong. http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/stamp/stamp.jsp?arnumber=06360351
  14. Clear, T. (2011). Replicating an 'Onshore' Capstone Computing
Project in a 'Farshore' Setting – an Experience Report. In M. Ali Babar, & C. Lescher (Eds.), 2011 Sixth IEEE International Conference on Global Software Engineering ICGSE 2011 (pp. 161-165). Los Alamitos, California: IEEE Computer Society Conference Publishing Services (CPS).
  15. Clear, A. L., & Clear, T. (2011). The Fate of Computing in Research Performance Evaluation Schemes – ERA vs PBRF. In S. Mann, & M. Verhaart (Eds.), Proceedings of the 2nd Annual Conference of Computing and Information Technology Research and Education (CITRENZ2011) incorporating the 24th Annual NACCQ Conference (pp. 51-62). Hamilton: CITRENZ. Retrieved from http://www.naccq.ac.nz/conferences/2011/pdf/51-62.pdf
  16. Kachapova, F., & Kachapov, I. (2011). Population Regression Model in University Courses. In J. Hannah, & M. Thomas (Eds.), Volcanic DELTA (8th Southern hemisphere conference on teaching and learning undergraduate mathematics and statistics) (pp. 441). Rotorua, New Zealand: University of Canterbury and University of Auckland.
  17. Klymchuk, S., Gruenwald, N., & Jovanoski, Z. (2011). University lecturers' views on the transition from secondary to tertiary education in mathematics: An international survey. In J. Hannah, & M. Thomas (Eds.), Proceedings of Volcanic Delta 2011, the 8th Southern Hemisphere Conference on Teaching and Learning Undergraduate Mathematics and Statistics, Rotorua, New Zealand (pp. 190-201). Rotorua, New Zealand: University of Canterbury & University of Auckland.
  18. Sarkar, N., & Petrova, K. (2011). Teaching advanced computer networking: A miniproject-based learning approach. In L. A. Tomei (Ed.), Online courses and ICT in education: Emerging practices and applications (pp. 275-289). Hershey, PA, USA: IGI Global. doi:10.418/978-1-60960-150-8.ch021
  19. Sheard, J., Simon., Carbone, A., Chinn, D., Laakso, M. -J., Clear, T., . . . Philpott, A. (2011). Exploring Programming Assessment Instruments: A Classification Scheme for Examination Questions. In M. Caspersen, A. Clear, & K. Sanders (Eds.), Proceedings of the 2011 International Computing Education Research Workshop (pp. 33-38). New York: ACM.
  20. Spooner, K. (2011). Do we prepare our secondary students for higher level Mathematics? Proceedings of Institute of Information and Mathematical Sciences Seventh Postgraduate Students Conference pp 160-173. Massey University, Albany
  21. Whalley, J., & Philpott, A. (2011). A unit testing approach to building novice programmers' skills and confidence. In J. Hamer, & M. De Raadt (Eds.), Proceedings Australasian Computing Education Conference (ACE 2011), Perth, Australia. CRPIT, 114. (pp. 113-118).
  22. Egea, K., Lu, J., Xiao, J., & Clear, T. (2010). Internationalisation and Cross Cultural Issues in Computing Education. In T. Clear, & J. Hamer (Eds.), Proc. Twelfth Australasian Computing Education Conference (ACE 2010), CRPIT Vol. 103 (pp. 25-31). Brisbane, Australia.
  23. Clear, T., & MacDonell, S. (2010). Beyond 'Temponomics' - The Many Dimensions of Time in Globally Distributed Project Teams. In Y. Dubinski, & A. Milewski (Eds.), Proceedings of the Fifth IEEE International Conference on Global Software Engineering (ICGSE 2010 (pp. 297-304). Princeton, New Jersey: IEEE.
  24. Schulte, C., Clear, T., Taherkhani, A., Busjahn, T., & Paterson, J. (2010). An introduction to program comprehension for computer science educators. In A. Clear, & L. R. Dag (Eds.), Proceedings of the 2010 ITiCSE Working group reports (ITiCSE-WGR '10) (pp. 65-86). New York: ACM. doi:10.1145/1971681.1971687
  25. Philpott, A. (2010). Software Engineering Education. In ASWEC on Software Engineering Education Workshop ASWEC 2010, 21st Australian Software Engineering Conference.
  26. Sauerbier, G., Narayanan, A., Gruenwald, N., Klymchuk, S., & Zverkova, T. (2010). Teaching non-traditional applications to engineering students. In A. Araujo, A. Fernandes, A. Azevedo, & J. F. Rodrigues (Eds.), Proceedings of the International Conference on Educational Interfaces between Mathematics and Industry
    (pp. 437-447). Lisbon, Portugal.
  27. Gruenwald, N., Sauerbier, G., Narayanan, A., Klymchuk, S., & Zverkova, T. (2010). Teaching unusual applications in engineering mathematics: Students' attitudes. In D. Schott (Ed.), Proceedings of the 15th Seminar of the European Society for Engineering Education Mathematics Working Group (SEFI MWG) "Mathematical Education of Engineers" (E-format) (6 pages). Wismar, Germany.
  28. Cajander, Å., Clear, T., & Daniels, M. (2009). Introducing an External Mentor in an International Open Ended Group Project. In 39th ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (pp. T2D1-T2D6). San Antonio, Texas.
  29. Cajander, Å., Clear, T., Daniels, M., Edlund, J., Hamrin, P., Laxer, C., . . . Persson, M. (2009). Students analyzing their collaboration in an International Open Ended Group Project. In 39th ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (pp. M1D1-M1D6). San Antonio, Texas.
  30. Clear, T. (2009). Dimensions of Collaboration in Global Software Engineering Teams: Explorations of 'Collaborative Technology Fit'. In Fourth IEEE International Conference on Global Software Engineering (IGCSE'09. Limerick, Ireland.
  31. Hong, Y., Kerr, S., Klymchuk, S., McHardy, J., Murphy, P., Spencer, S., Thomas, M., & Watson, P. (2009). Modelling the transition from secondary to tertiary mathematics education. In L. Paditz, & A. Rogerson (Eds.), Proceedings of the 10th International Conference of the Mathematics Education into the 21st Century (pp. 250-254). Dresden, Germany.
  32. Hong, Y., Kerr, S., Klymchuk, S., McHardy, J., Murphy, P., Spencer, S., Thomas, M., & Watson, P. (2009). Teachers' perspectives on the transition from secondary to tertiary mathematics education. In H. Bicknell, & Burgess (Eds.), Proceedings of the 32nd International Conference of Mathematics Education Research Group Australasia (MERGA-32) (pp. 241-248). Wellington, New Zealand.
  33. Kachapova, F., & Kachapov, I. (2009). Geometric Interpretation of Optimal Portfolio. In 3rd International Conference of Science and Mathematics Education (CoSMEd) (pp. 272-279). Penang, Malaysia.
  34. Klymchuk, S., & Thomas, M. (2009). Teachers' mathematical knowledge: Influence of attention. In M. Tzekaki, M. Kaldrimidou, & H. Sakonidis (Eds.), Proceedings of the 33rd Conference of the International Group for the  Psychology of Mathematics Educations (PME-33) Vol. 3 (pp. 361-368). Thessaloniki, Greece.
  35. Philpott, A., Clear, T., & Whalley, J. (2009). Understanding Student Performance on an Algorithm Simulation Task: Implications for Guided Learning. In M. Guzdial, & S. Fitzgerald (Eds.), Proceedings of the 40th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education (pp. 408-412). Chattannooga, Tennessee: ACM.
  36. Clear, T., & Kassabova, D. (2008). A Course in Collaborative Computing: Collaborative Learning and Research with a Global Perspective. In M. Guzdial, & S. Fitzgerald (Eds.), Proceedings of the 39th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education (pp. 63-67). Portland, Oregon: ACM.
  37. Clear, T., Whalley, J., Hill, J., Liu, Y., Pears, A., & Plimmer, B. (2008). A Global Software Project: Developing a Tablet PC Capture Platform for Explanograms. In L. Malmi, & A. Pears (Eds.), Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Computing Education Research (pp. 41-50). New York: ACM. doi:10.1145/1595356.1595364
  38. Klymchuk, S., & Mays, M. (2008). Current problems and challenges in non-university tertiary mathematics education. In M. Niss (Ed.), Proceedings of the 10th International Congress on Mathematics Education (ICME-10) (pp. 519-523). Copenhagen, Denmark.
  39. Klymchuk, S., Zverkova, T., Gruenwald, N., & Sauerbier, G. (2008). Increasing engineering students' awareness to environmental issues through innovative teaching of mathematical modelling. In B. Alpers (Ed.), Proceedings of the joint 14th Seminar of the European Society for Engineering Education Mathematics Working Group (SEFI MWG) and 6th Conference of the Institute of Mathematics and Its Applications on Mathematical Education of Engineers (E-format) (6 pages). Loughborough University, UK.
  40. Gruenwald, N., Sauerbier, G., Klymchuk, S., & Zverkova, T. (2008). Mission 2 Mars und andere Projekte in einem extracurricularen Kurs f¨ur Ingenieurstudenten (Mission to Mars and other projects in an extra-curriculum course for engineering students). In D. Schott (Ed.), Proceedings of the 6th German Workshop "Mathematics for Engineers" Vol. 2 (pp. 45-53). Soest, Germany.
  41. Gruenwald, N., Sauerbier, G., Zverkova, T., & Klymchuk, S. (2008). Teaching business applications to future engineers. In Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Engineering and Business Education (E-format) (6 pages). Wismar, Germany.
  42. Gruenwald, N., Sauerbier, G., Zverkova, T., & Klymchuk, S. (2007). A novel approach to teach mathematical modelling to engineering students: A case study. In J. Szendrei (Ed.), Proceedings of the Congress of International Commission for the Study and Improvement of Mathematics Education CIEAEM-59 (pp. 174-178). Dobogoko, Hungary.
  43. Philpott, A., Buchan, J., & Connor, A. M. (2007). An integrated tool set to support software engineering learning. In Software Innovation and Engineering New Zealand (SIENZ07). Auckland, NZ
  44. Philpott, A., Robbins, P., & Whalley, J. L. (2007). Assessing the steps on the road to relational thinking. In 20th Annual Conference of the National Advisory Committee on Computing Qualifications NACCQ 2007 (pp. 286). Nelson, New Zealand.
  45. Gruenwald, N., Sauerbier, G., Zverkova, T., & Klymchuk, S. (2006). Mathematische Modellierung fur Ingenierurstudenten im Interdisziplinaren Kontext (Teaching mathematical modelling in a multidisciplinary context). In D. Schott (Ed.), Proceedings of the 5th German Workshop "Mathematics for Engineers" Vol. 3 (pp. 19-26). Wismar, Germany.
  46. Gruenwald, N., Sauerbier, G., Zverkova, T., & Klymchuk, S. (2006). Teaching mathematical modelling of survival and sustainability to engineering students. In Z. Pudlovski (Ed.), Proceedings of the 10th Baltic Region Seminar on Engineering Education (pp. 174-176). Szczecin, Poland.
  47. Klymchuk, S., & Gruenwald, N. (2006). Counter-examples in calculus as a pedagogical strategy. In D. Hughes Hallett, I. Vakalis, H. Arikan, & D. Quinney (Eds.), Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Teaching Mathematics at the Undergraduate Level (ICTM-3) (E-format) (5 pages). Istanbul, Turkey: John Wiley & Sons.
  48. Sarkar, N. I., & Petrova, K. (2006). A flexible learning system for teaching computer network design to business students. In B. Andersson (Ed.), Proceedings  of the Bi-annual 2006 Distance Education Association of New Zealand Conference. Auckland, New Zealand. Retrieved from http://akoaotearoa.ac.nz/research-register/825
  49. Gilbert, J., Hipkins, R., & Cooper, G. (2005). Faction or fiction? Using narrative pedagogies in school science education. Paper presented at the Redesigning Pedagogy: Research, Policy, Practice conference. Nanyang University National Institute of Education, Singapore, 30 May - 1 June 2005.
  50. Klymchuk, S., Zverkova, T., Gruenwald, N., & Sauerbier, G. (2005). Mathematische Modelle der Ökologie für Ingenieurstudenten (Mathematical models of ecology for engineering students). In D. Schott (Ed.), Proceedings of the German Workshop-2005 "Mathematics for Engineers" (pp. 43-51). Bremen, Germany.
  51. Sarkar, N.I. & Petrova, K. (2005). WebLan-Designer: a Web-based System for Interactive Teaching and Learning LAN Design. Proceedings of the 3rd IEEE International Conference on Information Technology Research and Education (ITRE'05), 328-332, Hsinchu, Taiwan.

Back to top

Refereed book chapters and reports

  1. Klymchuk, S., Thomas, M., Alexander, J., Evans, T., Gulyaev, S., Liu, W., Murphy, P., Novak, J., Stephens, J., Zaliwski, A. (2020). Investigating the Impact of Non-Routine Problem Solving on Creativity, Engagement and Intuition of STEM Tertiary Students (2020 TLRI Project Report). Wellington, New Zealand: The New Zealand Council for Educational Research. http://www.tlri.org.nz/tlri-research/research-completed/post-school-sector/investigating-impact-non-routine-problem-solving.
  2. Spooner, K. (2020). A Lecturer’s Learning Goals for Teaching Mathematical Modelling. In G.A. Stillman, G. Kaiser, E. Lampen (Eds.), Mathematical modelling education and sense making (pp. 479-489). Cham: Springer.
  3. Spooner, K. (in Press). Promoting Conditions for Student Learning in a Mathematical Modelling Course. In F. Leung, G.A. Stillman, G. Kaiser, K. Lok Wong (Eds.), Mathematical modelling in East and West. Cham: Springer.
  4. Shraddha Nayak, Md. Akbar Hossain, Farhaan Mirza, M. Asif Naeem, and Noreen Jamil.  (2019). E-brace: A secure electronic health record access method in medical emergency.  In Intelligent Technologies and Applications, pages 16–27, Singapore, Springer.
  5. Klymchuk, S., Thomas, M., Gulyaev, S., & Evans, T. (2017). Enhancing Generic Thinking Skills of Tertiary STEM Students through Puzzle-based Learning (2017 Ako Aotearoa Project Report). (21 pages). Wellington, New Zealand: Ako Aotearoa.
  6. Clear, T. (2017). Monitoring Report for Whitireia New Zealand and WelTec: Master of Information Technology, PostGraduate Diploma in Information Technology, PostGraduate Diploma in Information Technology Degree Programmes. Auckland New Zealand: Auckland University of Technology.
  7. Spooner, K. (2017). Authentic Mathematical Modelling Experiences of Upper Secondary School Students: A Case study. In G. Stillman, W.Blum, G. Kaiser (Eds.) Mathematical Modelling and Applications, Crossing and Researching Boundaries in Mathematics Education (pp. 627 – 638). Switzerland: Springer.
  8. Hankin, R. (2016). Screencasts in Mathematics: Modelling the Mathematician. In Handbook of Research on Cloud-Based STEM Education for Improved Learning Outcomes DOI: 10.4018/978-1-4666-9924-3.ch014
  9. Mpofu, C. (2016). STEM fields and Ethnic Women in New Zealand: Issues of sexism and racism. p181-207.  In U. Thomas, & J. Drake (Eds.), Critical Research on Sexism and Racism in STEM Fields. IGI Global Retrieved from: http://www.igi-global.com/chapter/stem-fields-and-ethnic-women-in-new-zealand/154638
  10. Sarkar, N. I. (2016). Teaching Wireless Network Fundamentals Using Low-Cost Wi-Fi Devices. In M. Raisinghani (Ed.), Revolutionizing Education through Web-Based Instruction (pp. 281-299). Hershey, PA, USA: IGI Global. Retrieved from http://www.igi-global.com.ezproxy.aut.ac.nz/gateway/chapter/146944. doi:10.4018/978-1-4666-9932-8. ch015
  11. Sarkar, N. I., Kuang, A. X., Nisar, K., & Amphawan, A. (2015). Hospital Environment Scenarios using WLAN over OPNET Simulation Tool. In Healthcare Administration: Concepts, Methodologies, Tools, and Applications (pp. 789-804). Hershey, PA: Medical Information Science Reference. doi:10.4018/978-1-4666-6339-8.ch040.
  12. Sarkar, N. I., Kuang, A. X., Nisar, K., & Amphawan, A. (2015). Performance Studies of Integrated Network Scenarios in a Hospital Environment. In Healthcare Administration: Concepts, Methodologies, Tools, and Applications (pp. 1398-1425). Hershey, PA: Medical Information Science Reference. doi:10.4018/978-1-4666-6339-8.ch076.
  13. Zhang, D., & Clear, T. (2015). Shaping Behaviours through Space and Place in Gamified Virtual Learning Environments In T. Reiners & L. Wood (Eds.), Gamification in Education and Business (pp. 331-354). Cham Heidelberg New York Dordrecht London: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-10208-5
  14. Black, M. (2015). Performance of Students in Year 13 Statistics. Professional Report commissioned by NZQA.
  15. Beecham, S., Clear, T., Barr, J., & Noll, J. (2015). Protocol for Challenges and Recommendations for the Design and Conduct of Global Software Engineering Courses: A Systematic Review ("(ITiCSE Working Group One: Technical Report No. Lero_TR_2015_01)). Limerick, Ireland Retrieved from http://www.lero.ie/sites/default/files/Protocol-Teaching_GSDSLR.pdf
  16. Gilbert, J., & Bull, A. (2013). Building a future-oriented science education system in New Zealand: How are we doing?. Wellington, New Zealand: New Zealand Council for Educational Research. Retrieved from http://www.nzcer.org.nz/
  17. Bolstad, R., Bull, A., Carson, S., Gilbert, J., MacIntyre, W., & Spiller, L. (2013). Strengthening engagements between schools and the science community: Final report. Wellington, NZ: Ministry of Education.
  18. Sarkar, N. I., & Petrova, K. (2013). Design and Evaluation of a Web-Based Tool for Teaching Computer Network Design to Undergraduates. In N. Karacapilidis, M. Raisinghani, & E. Ng (Eds.), Web-Based and Blended Educational Tools and Innovations, IGI Global (Chapter 14, pp 214-234). Hershey, PA: Information Science. Reference. doi:10.4018/978-1-4666-2023-0.
  19. Clear, T., Claxton, G., Thompson, S., & Fincher, S. (2011). Cooperative and Work-Integrated Education in Information Technology. In R. Coll, & K. Zegwaard (Eds.), International Handbook for Cooperative & Work-Integrated Education (pp. 141-150). Lowell, MA: World Association for Cooperative Education Inc..
  20. Klymchuk, S., Narayanan, A., Gruenwald, N., Sauerbier, G., & Zverkova, T. (2011). Modelling of infectious disease with biomathematics: Implications for teaching and research. In G. Kaiser, W. Blum, R. B. Ferri, & G. Stillman (Eds.), Trends in Teaching and Learning of Mathematical Modelling (Vol. 1, pp. 489-498). Springer Verlag. doi:10.1007/978-94-007-0910-2
  21. Sarkar, N.I. & Petrova, K. (2011). Teaching Advanced Computer Networks using Miniprojects" In L. Tomei (Ed.), Online Courses and ICT in Education: Emerging Practices and Applications, IGI Global (Chapter 21, pp 275-289). Hershey, PA: Information Science.
  22. Bull, A., Gilbert, J., Barwick, H., Hipkins, R. and Baker, R. (2010). Inspired by Science – a paper commissioned by the Prime Minister's Science Advisor. Wellington: New Zealand Council for Educational Research. [This paper informed the later report: Looking Ahead: Science Education for the Twenty-First Century: a report from the Prime Minister's Chief Science Advisor (known as the 'Gluckman Report'). April 2011. Available at www.pmcsa.org.nz.
  23. Thomas, M., Klymchuk, S., Hong, Y., Kerr, S., McHardy, J., Murphy, P., Spencer, S., & Watson, P. (2010). The Transition from Secondary to Tertiary Mathematics Education (2010 TLRI Report) (Online). Wellington, New Zealand: The New Zealand Council for Educational Research. Retrieved from http://www.tlri.org.nz/sites/default/files/projects/9262SummaryReport.pdf
  24. Black, M. (2009). Unit standard based assessment involving official statistics: An evaluation of four assessment tools. In L. H. Meyer, S. Davidson, H. Anderson, R. Fletcher, P. M. Johnston, & M. Rees (Eds.), Tertiary Assessment & Higher Education Student Outcomes - Policy, Practice & Research, Ako Aotearoa – The National Centre for Tertiary Teaching Excellence. Wellington, New Zealand.
  25. Gotterbarn, D., Clear, T., Gray, W., & Houliston, B. (2009). Developing Software in a Bicultural Context: The Role of a SoDIS Inspection. In P. F. Tiako (Ed.), Software Applications: Concepts, Methodologies, Tools, and Applications (Vol. 6). Hershey, PA: Information Science Reference.
  26. Klymchuk, S. (2009). Using counter-examples to enhance learners' understanding of undergraduate mathematics. In Good Practice Publication Grants (Online) (9 pages). New Zealand: Ako Aotearoa National Centre on Tertiary Teaching Excellence. Retrieved from http://akoaotearoa.ac.nz/download/ng/file/group-3300/using-counter-examples-to-enhance-learners-understanding-of-undergraduate-mathematics.pdf
  27. Sarkar, N.I. (2009). A Web-Based Tool for Teaching WLAN Design Fundamentals to Undergraduates. In P. Rogers, et al. (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Distance Learning, (2nd ed., Vol IV, 2337-2345). Hershey PA: Information Science Reference. ISBN: 978-1-60566-198-8.
  28. Sarkar, N. I. & Petrus, K. (2009). Logic-Minimiser: a Software Tool for Teaching and Learning Minimisation of Boolean Expressions. In P. F. Tiako Sarkar (Ed.), Software Applications: Concepts, Methodologies, Tools, and Applications.  (1334-1344).  Hershey PA: Information Science Publishing, ISBN:13: 9781605660608.
  29. Siringoringo, W., & Sarkar, N. I. (2009). Teaching and Learning Wi-Fi Networking Fundamentals Using Limited Resources. In J. Gutierrez (Ed.), Selected Readings on Telecommunications and Networking (pp. 22-40). Hershey PA: Information Science Reference.
  30. Black, M. S., Forbes, S., Moses, K., Pihama, N., Bechervaise, N., & Cullen, K. (2008). Towards retention: the role of assessment,motivation and prior knowledge in learner completion. Ako Aoteroa, Wellington.
  31. Roberts, J., Gardiner, B., Gilbert, J., & Vaughan, K. (2008). Trading choices: young people's career decisions and gender segregation in the trades. Wellington: Ministry of Women's Affairs.
  32. Sarkar, N. I. (2008). An Interactive Tool for Teaching and Learning LAN Design. In C. Slyke (Ed.), Information and Communication Technologies: Concepts, Methodologies, Tools, and Applications. Information Science Reference (1726-1740). Hershey PA, New York. ISBN: 978-1-59904-949-6.
  33. Sarkar, N. I. (2008). LAN Designer: A Software Tool to Enhance Learning and Teaching Server-Based LAN Design. In C. Slyke (Ed.), Information and Communication Technologies: Concepts, Methodologies, Tools, and Applications. Information Science Reference. (1741-1751) Hershey PA, New York. ISBN: 978-1-59904-949-6).
  34. Sarkar, N. I. (2008). Teaching TCP/IP Networking Using Practical Exercises. In L. Tomei (Ed.), Adapting Information and Communication Technologies for Effective Education. (2, 205-214). Hershey PA: IGI Global. ISBN-13:978-1-59904-922-9.
  35. Gruenwald, N., Sauerbier, G., Zverkova, T., & Klymchuk, S. (2007). Models of ecology in teaching engineering mathematics. In C. Haines, P. Galbraith, W. W. Blum, & S. Khan (Eds.), Mathematical Modelling (ICTMA 12): Education, Engineering and Economics (pp. 314-322). UK: Horwood Publishing.
  36. Sarkar, N. I. (2007). An Interactive Tool for Teaching and Learning LAN Design. In L. Tomei (Ed.), Integrating Information & Communications Technologies into the Classroom (pp. 253-271). Hershey PA: Idea Group Reference. ISBN: 1-59904259-2.
  37. Sarkar, N. I. and Petrova, K. (2006). WebLan-Designer: a Web-Based Tool for Teaching and Learning Wired and Wireless LAN Design.  In N. Sarkar (Ed.), Tools for Teaching Computer Networking and Hardware Concepts (pp.21-38). Hershey PA: Information Science Publishing,  ISBN: 1-59140-735-4.
  38. Sarkar, N.I. and Craig, T.M. (2006), Enhancing Teaching and Learning Computer Hardware Fundamentals Using PIC-Based Projects.  In N. Sarkar (Ed.), Tools for Teaching Computer Networking and Hardware Concepts (pp 229-248.)Hershey PA: Information Science Publishing, ISBN: 1-59140-735-4,
  39. Craig, T.M. & Sarkar N.I. (2006) Enhancing Teaching and Learning Wireless Communication Networks Using Wireless Projects. In N. Sarkar (Ed.), Tools for Teaching Computer Networking and Hardware Concepts (pp 135-153). Hershey PA: Information Science Publishing, ISBN: 1-59140-735-4.
  40. Gilbert, J. (2005). Catching the Knowledge Wave? 'Knowledge society' developments and the future of public education in New Zealand. In: J. Codd & K. Sullivan (Eds.), Education Policy Directions in Aotearoa/New Zealand: Looking for a Third Way? (pp. 53–70). Southbank, VIC: Thomson Dunmore Press.
  41. Gilbert, J. & Calvert, S. (2005). Challenging accepted wisdom: Looking at the gender and science question through a different lens. In: J. K Gilbert (ed.) Science education: Major themes (Volume 1, Chapter 14, pp. 276-297). London: Taylor & Francis.
  42. Sarkar, N.I. (2005). Enhancing learning and teaching wireless LAN design. In C. Howard et al (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Distance Learning (pp 835-844). Hershey PA: Idea Group Reference, ISBN: 1-59140-555-6.

Back to top